Back to Research Hub

Validator Slashing Incidents Are a Warning. Sui Could Be Next.

PGDN Team2 min read

Recent Ethereum validator slashings (via the SSV Labs ecosystem) highlight how fragile staking infrastructure can become when operational practices fail. In this case, the protocol held, but external key management mistakes led to costly penalties.

Our latest scan of the Sui validator set uncovered something deeper: nearly 40% of validator voting power exposed. This wasn’t the result of a single misstep, but systemic misconfigurations and poor security hygiene across the network.

This is what happens when your dev team scraped a pass in GCSE ICT and called it cybersecurity.

Key Findings

  • Open SSH ports across core validators
  • Critical CVEs left unpatched (~28% of validators)
  • Default Apache landing pages exposed to the public internet
  • Docker port 2375 open on ~99% of validators, often with no firewall

By contrast, our initial scan of Aptos (Sui’s nemesis) showed no comparable issues.

Why It Matters

In proof-of-stake systems, it doesn’t take a 51% attack to break consensus. If more than ~33% of validator voting power goes offline, consensus halts, freezing the network and billions in assets. With 40% of voting power exposed, this is more than a bug bounty — it’s a systemic risk.

Links

PGDN.ai is committed to scanning decentralized networks for systemic risks and publishing transparent reports for the community.

Related Posts